For Federal regulations governing human subject research, go to the Health and Human Services website.
In accordance with the University's Assurance Agreement, when appropriate, the following will be reported to institutional officials, the federal Office of Human Research Protections, and/or other governmental agencies: any unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others; serious or continuing non-compliance with pertinent federal regulations or the requirements of the IRB; and suspension or termination of IRB approval of research protocols.
Non-compliance with IRB requirements will result in withdrawal of IRB approval and in the suspension or termination of the research.
Federal regulations require that all applications submitted to the IRB be screened to determine if the research is exempt from or requires a review. It is the IRB, not the researcher, that makes this decision. Accordingly, all applications are initially reviewed by a subcommittee of members of the IRB to determine whether a proposal will be considered under exempt, expedited or full Board review. The results of this initial review are announced at the first subsequent meeting of the full Board. Any member of the IRB, however, may ask that a proposal be given the consideration of the entire Board. In this event, the decision of the initial review is superseded by the decision of the full Board. The Board's decision is then recorded in the minutes.