53 Percent Say TV Revenue in NCAA Tournament Detracts from Academic Goals of a University
Two Years of College vs One? 41% Favor Raising the Age Limit for NBA Eligibility
A clear majority of the American public believes that television revenue generated by the NCAA Basketball Tournament has turned collegiate athletics into too big a business, detracting from a university's academic goals.
53% responded "yes" to that question in a Seton Hall Sports Poll conducted among 739 adults across the country. 35% responded "no." The poll has a +/- 3.7% margin of error and is conducted with both landline and cellphone users. The poll is sponsored by The Sharkey Institute.
When asked, however, how much importance universities place on graduating basketball players - 58% said they believed the schools placed either a high or medium importance on graduation. This is about even (59%) from a similar Seton Hall Sports Poll taken five years ago.
Both the NBA Commissioner and the president of the NCAA have suggested raising the minimum age for eligibility in the NBA draft from 19 to 20. That essentially raises the commitment to college basketball from one year to two years. 19% thought it should remain at one year, but 41% favored two years. 26% said there should be no limits. When asked this question two years ago, 12% favored one year, and 56% two years with 23% saying no limits.
63% felt requiring an extra year of eligibility in college
was a good thing, even if it meant losing a year of professional
salary. 26% said no to the extra year requirement. When asked this
question in 2014, 73% favored staying in school, a significant drop.
Number Who Say 'Scholarship Is Sufficient' Is Trending Down
45% of the nation felt student/athletes should not share in TV revenue or receive a salary for participating, with 40% saying they are exploited by not sharing in the revenue and should receive compensation. Men are more likely than women to believe that the students are being exploited, and people 18-44 are much more likely to believe that the students are exploited than those over 45.
60% felt providing a scholarship was sufficient for athletes, whereas 69% (2012) and 71% (2013) in previous Seton Hall Sports Polls felt providing a scholarship was sufficient. 35% believe the athletes should receive some form of salary or salary/scholarship.
"The public seems to be more sympathetic to increasing fees to student/athletes above scholarship," noted Rick Gentile, Director of the Poll. "This is in sync with major conferences beginning to offer additional 'cost of attendance' aid to student/athletes."
On the matter of whether people fill out a set of brackets or participate in a poll over this year's tournament, 13% said they did. 35% of the nation says they follow the tournament either closely or very closely.
Interest in the tournament vs. the NBA playoffs is virtually even, with 30% saying they are more interested in the NCAA and 29% the NBA. But when asked the same question in 2014, 39% said the NCAA and only 22% said the NBA. In 2011, 44% said NCAA and 29% said NBA.
46% of respondents felt that most (or all) colleges break the rules in recruiting athletes, the same number as when the question was asked in 2013.
Asked who makes better role models and given a choice of five options, 52% said teachers, 17% said coaches, 9% said college athletes, 9% said pro athletes, and 3% said politicians.
Articles featuring the Poll's most recent results include:
"Poll: More People Than Ever Believe College Athletes Should Be Paid"
"Ex-Michigan Tight End Jake Butt Believes College Players Should Be Paid"