Procedures for Promotion, Tenure, Sabbaticals
Procedures and criteria for promotion and tenure are spelled out in the Faculty Guide, Seton Hall University, for faculty on the South Orange campus; in the Faculty Guide, School of Theology, for faculty in the School of Theology; and in the Tenure, Promotion, and Appointment Standards of the School of Law (Adopted on May 12, 2006), for faculty of the School of Law.
The major change for Academic Year 2009-2010 is the following: For both confidentiality and sustainability, the material submitted for tenure and promotion review should be submitted electronically, including applications, supporting materials, and committee decisions. Paper copies should not be provided of material that can be distributed electronically, and committee members should avoid generating paper copies to the extent possible and should destroy any necessary paper copies as soon as practicable after their deliberations. The primary exceptions would be
a) The Tenure/Promotion application should be available in both formats, with a single paper version to be signed by the applicant, committee chairs, and other academic officials at different stages of the process, and an electronic copy without signatures, and b) Any supporting material of a format that cannot be easily shared electronically. Applicants should notify their deans’ offices in advance of supporting material of this nature.
Further detail of these changes can be found below.
Procedures and criteria for sabbaticals are addressed for faculty in the School of Theology in the Faculty Guide, School of Theology; for other faculty on the South Orange campus, in the Faculty Guide, Seton Hall University. The provisions concerning sabbaticals in the latter document will also be applied to faculty in the School of Law. Academic Memorandum 86-9, dated January 30, 1987, provides additional guidelines for sabbaticals, which have been incorporated into the present document. A copy of the Faculty Guide is available here.
Policy ID:
Date Instituted: September 1, 1986
Last Revised: September 21, 2009
Policy Description
I. Promotion and Tenure and Renewal of Faculty Associates
-
Deadline for submitting application to the
department: October 1.
- Standards: Article 4 of the Faculty Guide, Seton
Hall University; article 4 of the Faculty Guide, School of Theology;
and sections III and IV of the Tenure, Promotion, and Appointment
Standards, School of Law. Please note that "work performed after
the appointment is the basis for the first promotion, and work
performed after a previous promotion is the basis for the next
promotion."
NOTE: Tenure is awarded (1) only as an affirmative
action of the Board of Regents, and (2) only at the rank of associate
or full professor.
- Department Criteria: Applicants should
consult with their departments and schools on supplemental processes
that are in force concerning tenure and promotion. Such
guidelines should be on file in the office of the dean.
- Procedures: Article 5 of the Faculty Guide, Seton
Hall University; article 5 of the Faculty Guide, School of Theology;
and section I of the Tenure, Promotion, and Appointment Standards,
School of Law.
- Need for Position: All schools and departments are
governed by the provision cited in article 4 (introductory paragraph 1
and re-emphasized in 4.5.e.) of the Faculty Guide, Seton Hall
University: "Although the criteria for tenure are identical to the
criteria for associate professor, an additional consideration for
tenure must be the needs of the department or college, including
prospective enrollment in the program in which the applicant
teaches." Therefore, the granting of tenure to a faculty member
shall depend upon the following information which must be submitted by
the department or school (if there are no departments):
- Faculty:
-
Number of tenured faculty, including faculty on
sabbatical
- Number of tenure track (probationary) faculty
- Number of term faculty
-
Percent of courses taught by adjuncts during the
current semester
- Enrollments: A list of courses/sections
taught by the faculty member with enrollment figures for each course
and section for the current semester and the six preceding semesters.
- Long-Range Need: A description of
departmental and University needs this faculty member is to meet in the
immediate and long-range future; it should consider that needs are
likely to change and that the faculty member may have to assume
different functions in years to come.
The Dean's Assessment of Need for Faculty Member is also required.
- Teaching Effectiveness is addressed by article 4.1
of the Faculty Guide, Seton Hall University; article 4.3.a. of the
Faculty Guide, School of Theology; and section III.A.1. of the Tenure,
Promotion, and Appointment Standards, School of Law. In addition
to the applicant's documentation of his/her teaching effectiveness,
each department or school which approves an application for
promotion/tenure will forward with the application a precise and
detailed statement on the attributes of the applicant as a college
teacher. Knowledge of the discipline, method of instruction,
concern and enthusiasm for teaching, relations with students, as well
as participation in academic advising, curriculum development,
instructional research, and teaching improvement programs on and off
campus should be included in the department's evaluation.
Experience with and skills in using information technology in
instruction must now be considered when evaluating effective teaching.
- Publications as evidence of scholarship are
addressed by article 4.3 of the Faculty Guide, Seton Hall University;
article 4.3.b. of the Faculty Guide, School of Theology; and section
II.C.2. of the Tenure, Promotion, and Appointment Standards, School of
Law. See especially article 4.3.b. of the Faculty Guide, Seton
Hall University: "Manuscripts accepted for publication must be
accompanied by a letter of acceptance from the publisher.
Completed research that is not yet accepted may not be listed under
publications. The applicant shall clearly distinguish research in
progress from publications."
- Preparation of the Application
- The application form is to be obtained from the
Provost’s web page. If the
application is for promotion and tenure, use one (1) form. Note
that the current application form was updated August 1, 2006.
The application is required in two (2) formats:
- hard copy requiring signatures at each level of the process, and
- electronic copy to be submitted to the chairperson
- Each faculty application must include a table of
contents of the file of Publications and Supporting
Documentation. The table will list each item submitted by the
applicant.
- One complete file of Publications and Supporting
Documentation including a complete curriculum vitae should be developed
by the applicant and submitted, with the application, to the department
chairperson. Where possible, documents that are available electronically should be submitted in that format. Appropriate committee members will access the documents via Blackboard. Supplementary materials in support of the application that are not available in electronic format should be submitted to the chairperson in their original format. These materials shall be transmitted from the department
to the office of the dean of the college for use by the Rank and Tenure Committee of the college and by the dean. Following their review,
the original application (hard copy) with signatures, plus any supporting material that was not shared in electronic format are to be delivered by
each dean's office to a secured area designated by the Office of the Provost for use by the University Rank and Tenure
Committee.
The Teaching, Learning and Technology Center is a resource available for rendering paper documents and other material into shareable electronic documents. For Academic year 2009-2010, please contact Amy Phillips of TLT Center for assistance. The candidate should alert the Deans' Office as soon as possible to specific items in the supporting material that cannot be shared electronically.
- Additions to and/or subtractions from the dossier
may only be made with the written consent of the applicant and for good
and sufficient reason.
- Please be sure all signatures and votes are
obtained before passing on a file to the next level (department
chairperson, chairperson of the college/school rank and tenure
committee, and the dean). The signed original should be forwarded
to the next appropriate office.
-
Guidelines for Rank and Tenure Committees and
Deans
-
The application for tenure and promotion to
associate professor is a single application decided in a single
vote. Therefore, no distinction may be made between tenuring and
promotion (Faculty Guide article 3.3k).
- Abstentions are not allowed, according to the
Faculty Guide: “All eligible committee members shall vote either
positively or negatively on each application, except for a clear
conflict of interest.”
- The application form and the file of Publications
and Supporting Documentation submitted by candidates must be kept
intact and so forwarded to the next level.
Committee members and deans will access all supporting material as well as the application itself with signatures through Blackboard. Committees should contact Amy Phillips of TLT Center for any technical questions about access to the appropriate Blackboard pages. For process questions or to request the addition of individuals to the access lists, please contact Kathleen Murphy of the Provost's office.
- Recommendations once made by deans, departments,
or rank and tenure committees are final; no subsequent modification or
amendment is possible.
- Based on the Faculty Guides, deans should make an
official determination of the appropriateness of a terminal degree.
- Applicants for promotion to professor who were
appointed or promoted to associate professor without tenure should
count years in this rank (not years as associate professor with tenure)
to meet the number of years as associate professor required by the
Faculty Guides.
- All communications with rank and tenure committees
should be channeled through the chair, whose responsibility it is to
pass on information or materials to the committee membership.
- Assessments of applicants must be based on facts
and must be verifiable; objectivity and fairness in judging candidates
are indispensable for a process that is complex and often difficult for
applicants.
- Information provided in the following sections is
to reflect only the time period on which the application is
based. For promotion this means the time period since previous
promotion. For tenure this means the time period served on a
probationary contract or the time period served on a probationary
contract plus the years of full-time service from another institution
which count toward the required tenure review.
- All parties to the rank and tenure process are
obligated to maintain the confidentiality of the process.
- All parties in the process must use and complete
the original application form.
-
Schedule For Promotion And Tenure Application
October 1
- Applicants for promotion and/or tenure submit applications with a file
of Publications and Supporting Documentation to department.
Responsibility: Applicant
November 1
- Applications submitted to dean in cases where departments do not exist.
Responsibility: Applicant
- Applications and the file of Publications and Supporting Documentation
submitted to the dean by departments.
Responsibility: Chairperson of Department
- The college/school Rank and Tenure Committee is convened.
Responsibility: Dean
- Applications and the file of Publications and Supporting Documentation
submitted to the college/school Rank and Tenure Committee.
Responsibility: Dean
December 15
- The college/school Rank and Tenure Committee makes its recommendation
to the provost.
Responsibility: Chairperson, School/College Rank and Tenure Committee - The dean submits his/her separate and distinct recommendation to the
provost.
Responsibility: Dean - Application and the file of Publications and Supporting Documentation
delivered to the location specified by the Office of the Provost.
Responsibility: Dean
December 20
- Convening University Rank and Tenure Committee.
Responsibility: Provost - Applications and files of Publications and Supporting Documentation to
University Rank and Tenure Committee.
Responsibility: Provost
March 1
- University Rank and Tenure Committee recommendations
to provost.
Responsibility: Chairperson, University Rank and Tenure Committee
March 15
- The Candidate may submit a supplementary statement, but not additional
documentation, to the provost on or before March 15.
April 1
- Notification to applicants of Provost’s action.
Responsibility: Provost
April 30
- Applicant notified of action taken by Academic Affairs Committee/Board
of Regents.
Responsibility: Provost
September 1
- Applications approved by the Board of Regents become effective.
- Schedule for Faculty Associates
The initial faculty associate appointment is made for a one-year period
and is renewable for another one-year period by mutual consent.
The faculty of the department must recommend renewal or termination of
the appointment by March 15 of that year.
If after two consecutive one-year appointments the faculty of the
department and the dean have recommended renewal and the provost
concurs, a three-year appointment begins. In the fall semester of
the third year of this appointment (fifth year of employment), the
faculty associate shall be reviewed by the tenured faculty of the
department, by the dean, and by the college Rank and Tenure Committee
following the timetable and procedures for tenure review. If the
department, the college Rank and Tenure Committee, and the dean all
approve, the faculty member shall be offered a five-year contract which
reiterates that this faculty associate position is not tenured nor does
time spent therein count toward the acquisition of tenure.
In the fall semester of the fifth year of a five-year contract for a
faculty associate position, the faculty member shall be reviewed as in
the above section for an additional five-year contract. This
review process shall be continued for each subsequent five-year
contract.
II. Appointment/Reappointment to Term Contracts in the Seminary School of Theology
-
Deadline for submitting applications, using
standard forms (obtainable from the Office of the Associate Dean,
Seminary School of Theology) for [re]appointment to a term contract:
October 1 of the calendar year preceding the one during which
applicant’s current contract expires.
The Office of the Associate Dean, Seminary School of Theology, will
notify full-time faculty members by March 1 of the year preceding the
date of expiration of a faculty member’s current contract that (s)he
will need to apply by October 1 for contract renewal. The Office
of the Associate Dean, Seminary School of Theology, will also notify
the School’s Committee on Rank and Evaluation to conduct an evaluation
of the faculty member pursuant to articles 4 and 5, School of Theology
Faculty Guide.
- Standards and Procedures: School of Theology
Faculty Guide, articles 3-5.
- Schedule
October 1
- Application for [re]appointment to a term contract, with supporting
documentation, due to Office of the Associate Dean, Seminary School of
Theology. The Associate Dean will, in turn, submit the
application and documentation to the applicant’s departmental
chairperson, who will initiate the departmental review process.
Responsibility: Applicant,
Associate Dean, Chairperson of Department
November 1
- The review process at the departmental level is completed, and the
application and documentation are transmitted to the Rector/Dean.
Responsibility: Chairperson of Department
- The Rector/Dean convenes the School’s Committee on Rank and Evaluation
and transmits thereto the application and documentation. The
Committee begins its review process.
Responsibility: Rector/Dean, Chairperson of the School’s Rank and
Evaluation Committee
March 1
- School’s Committee on Rank and Evaluation submits recommendations to
the Rector/Dean. The Rector/Dean reviews the recommendations to
the Department and the Chairperson of the School’s Rank and Evaluation
Committee.
Responsibility: Chairperson of the School’s Rank and Evaluation
Committee, Rector/ Dean
April 1
- The Rector/Dean completes his own separate and distinct recommendation
on application and informs the applicant of his decision. If the
Rector/Dean’s recommendation is favorable, he makes an appointment with
the President to consult about applicant’s [re]appointment to Seminary
School of Theology.
Responsibility: Rector/Dean
April 15
- After consultation with the President, the Rector/Dean forwards the
file to the Archbishop of Newark and asks that applicant be
[re]appointed to Immaculate Conception Seminary.
- Responsibility: President, Rector/Dean
April 30
- The Archbishop of Newark decides on [re]appointment to Immaculate
Conception Seminary and notifies the Rector/Dean and applicant in
writing.
Responsibility: Archbishop of Newark
- If the Archbishop’s action is affirmative, Rector/Dean [re]appoints the
applicant to the Seminary. The Rector/Dean consults with the
Provost about the applicant’s [re]appointment to School of Theology.
Responsibility: Rector/Dean
May 15
- The Provost makes a decision on the application for [re]appointment to
the School of Theology and notifies Rector/Dean.
Responsibility: Provost - If the Provost’s action is affirmative, the Rector/Dean appoints
applicant to the School of Theology and forwards the new term contract
to Provost for issuance by that Office.
Responsibility: Rector/Dean If Provost’s action is negative, the applicant is notified. - If Provost's action is negative, the applicant is notified.
Responsibility: Provost
May 31
- If the [re]appointment was approved by the Provost, the Provost issues
a term contract to applicant.
Responsibility: Provost
June 15
- If [re]appointment was denied by the Provost, the applicant must file
an appeal to the President pursuant to School of Theology Faculty
Guide, Art. 3.4[c].
Responsibility: Applicant
July 1
- Approved [re]appointments become effective.
III. Sabbatical
-
Deadline for submitting the application to the
school or department: October 1 of the year preceding the academic year
in which the leave is to be taken. However, a faculty member
should plan and prepare a sabbatical well ahead of the time he or she
submits the application to the department.
- Purpose of a sabbatical is defined by article 6.1
of the Faculty Guide, Seton Hall University: "The major purpose
of a sabbatical leave is to provide the opportunity for continued
professional growth and new or renewed intellectual achievement through
study, research, scholarly writing or professionally related travel."
- A sabbatical should be undertaken in association
with one's professional peers, whether at another university, a
library, or a research institute.
- A faculty member is strongly encouraged to apply
for a two-semester sabbatical, since a longer sabbatical can be more
productive. In addition, an outside agency is more likely to
grant funds for a year-long sabbatical project. A sabbatical
provides a good opportunity for seeking external funding in support of
research projects.
- Criteria for eligibility are spelled out in
article 6.1.a in both the Faculty Guide, Seton Hall University, and the
Faculty Guide, School of Theology.
- Criteria for selection are addressed for all
University faculty by article 6.1.c. of the Faculty Guide, Seton Hall
University, (and an almost identical article 6.1.d. of the Faculty
Guide, School of Theology), as well as by guidelines contained in
Academic Memorandum No. 86-9.
- The Faculty Guide, Seton Hall University, states:
"Primary consideration will be given to the academic potential of the
faculty member's proposal in terms of its contribution to the
discipline, the intellectual development of the individual or to the
strengthening of the department or the University." A sabbatical
project should be a research and/or writing project which advances
knowledge in the discipline, and the findings shall be published or
presented to the faculty member's academic peers. Alternatively,
the faculty member may propose a structured program of reading,
studying or training that will result in an outcome such as a
professional certification, a literature review, or an exhibition.
- The research project chosen (and the alternative
project) must adequately take into consideration the objectives,
programs and needs of the department. The Faculty Guide, Seton
Hall University, specifically requires that the participants in a
sabbatical decision shall consider the advantages of such leave to the
University. The proposal should include a projected timeframe for
concrete output for the project (such as the submission of a new course
to the relevant college and Senate committees, submission of a grant,
submission of a journal article) for the end product and for
appropriate intermediate milestones (such as IRB approval or completion
of a literature review). These benchmarks should be projected in
as much detail as possible (for example, specifying funding agency,
title of journal, etc.).
- The department must examine carefully the
proposed sabbatical project and evaluate it critically before making a
recommendation to the dean. The department should weigh the
impact of the faculty member's absence on its offerings and consider
especially the need for, and expense of, replacement faculty. If
there are several applications in a given year, the department should
recommend to the dean which application is to be given first
consideration and the grounds for that ranking.
- Procedures are outlined in article 6.1.b. of the
Faculty Guide, Seton Hall University, and article 6.1.c. of the Faculty
Guide, School of Theology. The steps outlined below should be
strictly observed, because a sabbatical demands serious accountability
on the part of all involved, including the faculty member, the
department, the dean, and the provost.
- To apply for a sabbatical:
A sabbatical request form is to be obtained from the Provost’s web page.
- A detailed description of
sabbatical plans and projects should be appended to the sabbatical
request form.
- During the sabbatical:
- The faculty
member should notify the Dean and Provost if circumstances arise during
the term of the project that substantially change the goal of the
project. It is understood that such circumstances could be
positive or negative.
- At the
midpoint of the sabbatical, the faculty member should send the Dean and
Provost a progress report on all the goals detailed in the sabbatical
proposal.
- At the completion of a sabbatical:
- The faculty member must submit
a sabbatical report to: (1) the department, (2) the dean of the school;
and (3) the provost. If the sabbatical ends in the fall semester,
the sabbatical report is due by February 15; if it ends in the spring
semester, the report is due by July 1. A sabbatical is considered
a serious investment on the part of all concerned, so faculty are
encouraged to prepare a detailed report in a professional style,
suitable for presentation to internal and external audiences.
- The department must report to
the dean on the value of the sabbatical leave for the faculty member
and the department's efforts. In addition, the department's
findings must be forwarded to the provost for inclusion in the faculty
member's file.
- Faculty are encouraged to
update the Dean and Provost as longer-term goals from the sabbatical
project are realized.
- The sabbatical should be
included among the Acknowledgments in publications of scholarship
engaged in during the sabbatical.
Related Documents:
Sabbatical Request Form Form to be used when applying for a sabbatical
Tenure/Promotion Application Form to be used when applying for tenure and/or promotion.
|
Office of the Provost Telephone (973) 761-9018 Fax (973) 275-2361 Presidents Hall Rm. 200 Business Hours Monday - Friday 8:45 a.m. - 4:45 p.m.
When can I register for classes? When do classes begin? Do we have school on Labor Day? The answers are all here.
|